| |
View
Information Reserves
Policy
In
August of 2004, residents came up with a recommendation for addressing covenant
compliance complaints. Petitions
are initially addressed by a committee of volunteers rather than by the Board.
This recommendation
was adopted by the Board during the September 14, 2004 Board meeting. In
April of 2005, the Board adopted a bylaw amendment to incorporate covenant enforcement,
including a hearing process and implementation of fines for non-compliance. Here
is the petition process. Petitioners
may select either option. History
of Efforts to Preserve and Restore Views
1940’s The
Boeing Company purchased Innis Arden in 1940 after the land had been logged. Boeing
promoted Innis Arden as having "inspiring views, wooded ravines, a profusion
of native shrubs with panoramic views of the water and the mountains."
Covenants were drawn up for the “development, improvement, maintenance, and protection
of the real property.” 1980s Many
lots in Innis Arden had lost or were losing their views due to vegetation on private
lots, despite covenants aimed at preserving views, such as those governing building
size and prohibiting such things as “spite” fences or hedges. In 1980, the newly
formed View Protection Committee drafted an amendment to the covenants limiting
the height of view-blocking trees on private lots. As required by the covenants,
the amendment was approved by the owners of at least 60 of 92 tracts (66%) in
Innis Arden I, 150 of 214 tracts (70%) in Innis Arden II, and 150 of 229 (66%)
in Innis Arden III. The signed instruments were recorded with the King County
Division of Records and the amendment (attachment A) became binding on June 17,
1982 on all lots, except for those that never had views. Shelly Rolfe, President,
and Judy Runions, Secretary, attested to the required number of signatures. While
most residents heeded the amendment and many lost views were restored, some refused
to conform, claiming the amendment was not legal. In spite of efforts by the Board,
view reclamation came to a halt. As
a result, in 1986 a lawsuit was filed against some 20 residents who refused to
observe the amendment (Innis Arden Club, Inc. v. Binns, Civ. No. 84-2-099622-5).
The Superior Court held the amendment valid and enforceable (see order).
In the subsequent appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed
the trial court’s judgment and declared that “protection of the area’s marine
and mountain view is eminently reasonable and such views very obviously are and
always have been one of the principle attractions of the Innis Arden development.”
The Superior Court created “Procedures For Special Master
Process”, and a diagram showing the
application of the amendment and appointed a judge to enforce the amendment in
individual cases. 1990s In
1992, the Superior Court decided that “the majority of the work that the covenants
were intended to accomplish has in fact been accomplished by that petition process”.
Judge Anne Ellington expressed concern about the “difference in cost to the parties
of participating through the Special Master process we designed versus individual
enforcement actions, but I think it very likely that the Community Club, faced
with the responsibility for doing so, could devise a very effective mediation
process which could resolve any outstanding issues.” Judge Ellington noted that
the guidelines (attachment B) that were set up for the Special Master Process
would continue to be binding. She urged the community to set up a “simple procedure”
that would perhaps “go some length toward healing the wounds…in this community”
(footnote 1). 2000s In
April and May of 2001, the Innis Arden Board appointed Marc Weinberg to the position
of View Information Chair, concerning trees on private property. This Non-Voting
Committee Chair served the role of 1) educating the community regarding views
on private property 2) exploring the feasibility of a community survey
regarding view preservation on private property and 3) working with the Building
& Remodels chair to develop a protocol for landscape review to be incorporated
into the approval process. The
Board recently approved of a permit application from the Grouse Reserve Neighborhood
Association. If approved, the application will allow affected residents to restore
their views through the reserve while still complying with Shoreline Development
Code. Footnotes: 1. Proceeding, June 15, 1992, No. 84-2-09622-5
View
Friendly Plantings The
following plants include ornamental species suitable for Western Washington and
a view community such as Innis Arden. Low
Shrubs-to 6
| ABELIA Edward Goucher |
Edward Goucher Abeilia | |
AUCUBA japonica nana |
Dwarf Aucuba | |
BERBERS |
Darwin & Warty Barberry |
| CARPENTERIA californica |
Mock Orange | |
CHAMAECYPARIS obtuse nana |
Dwarf Hinoki Cypress | |
CHAMECYPARIS pisifera filifera |
Thread Cypress | |
CHOSIYA ternata |
Mexican Orange | |
COTONEASTER microphyllus |
Rockspray Cotoneaster |
| DAPHNE |
Odora & Collina | |
ESCALLONIA compakta |
‘Compakta' & 'Fradesii’ & ‘Jubilee' |
| GAULTHERIA shallon |
Salal | |
ILEX crenata |
Japanese Holly & Buffords Holly |
| KALMIA latifolia |
Mountain Laurel | |
LEUCOTHOE catesbaei |
Drooping Leucothoe -also Texas sage |
| LIGUSTRUM japonica |
Wax-leaf Privet | |
MAH0NIA aquifolium |
Oregon Grape | |
NANDINA domestica |
Heavenly Bamboo -some compacts |
| OSMANTHUS delavayi |
Delavay Osmanthus | |
PIERSS japonica |
Andromeda or Lily of the Valley
shrub | |
PINUS Mugo mughus |
Mugho Pine | |
PITTOSPORUM tobira |
Wheeler's Dwarf Pittosporum |
| POTENTILLA fruiticosa |
Bush Cinquefoil | |
PRUNUS |
'Otto Luyken’ Laurel | |
RHAPHIOLEPIS indica |
Indian Hawthorn | |
RHODODENDREN |
Many - Also Azaleas |
| TERNSTROEMIA japonica |
Relative of Camellia | |
THUJA orientalis Berkmani |
‘Berkmans' Dwarf arborvitae | Deciduous
Trees--to 20'
| ACER
ginnala | Amur
Maple - variety “Flame’’ Bright red fall foliage |
| ACER
griseum | Paperbark
Maple | | ACER
palmatum (some) | Japanese
- Bloodgood or Bloodleaf | |
BETULA
youngi | Weeping
Birch | | CORNUS
- alternifolia
- Welshi
- Kousa
- Xrutgersensis
|
Pogada
Dogwood Tri-color
Dogwood Kousa-Gold
Star' Stellar
Dogwood - many varieties | |
COTINUS
coggyria | Purple
- Leaf Smoke Bush Variety 'Grace' shorter | |
MAGNOLIA
stelllata | Star
Magnolia | |
MALUS |
Crabapple-some
varieties- 'Arnold’-
‘Parkman'- ‘Sargent'- 'Floribunda'-
Echterineyer- Weeping | |
PRUNUS
(flowering cherry) |
Shogetsu
- Tri Loba – Weeping Cherry | |
SOPHORA |
Weeping
Pagoda Tree | |
STEWARTIA
| Mountain
stewartia & variety‘Grandiflora' | |
ULMUS |
Camperdown
Elm - weeping | Low
Conifer Trees--to 20’
| CHAMAECYPARIS obtuse gracilis
| Slender Hinoki Cypress | |
CHAMAECYPARIS pisifera ‘Cyano Viridis’ |
Boulevard False Cypress | |
TSUGA mertensiana |
Mountain Hemlock | |
THUJA occidentalis Pyranidalus
| Pyramidalis (easily maintained) |
| TAXUS baccata stricta |
Irish Yew (easily maintained) |
Native
Plants
| Acer
circinatum* | Vine
Maple: 15-25’, drought tolerant, beautiful in groves or as individuals. Nice winter
form. | | Amelanchier
alnifolia | Serviceberry:
6-8’, Deciduous, erect shrub with clusters of pristine white flowers followed
by ½ inch purple berries loved by birds and people for pies and jam. Tolerates
full, hot sun. | |
Cornus sericea,
occidentalis | Red-osier
dogwood, creek dogwood, red-twig dogwood (to 15’) |
| Gaultheria
shallon | Salal
(3’-7’) | |
Holodiscus discolor,
creambush, arrowwood, rock-spiraea |
Oceanspray, (to 15’) |
| Lithocarpus
densiflorus var echinoides |
Tanbark Oak: 6-8’, Handsome
evergreen. New growth is silvery to cream to pink. The species is tall, so be
sure to get var. echinoids. | |
Lonicera ciliosa |
Orange honeysuckle, trumpet
honeysuckle (10’ to 20’) | |
Oemleria cerasiformis |
Indian-plum, osoberry
(5’ – 16’) | |
Physocarpus capitatus |
Pacific ninebark, ninebark
(6’-13’) | |
Ribes sanguineum |
Red flowering currant: 6-9’, lovely spring flowers attract hummingbirds.
An exceptional Northwest native, prized by gardeners. | |
Rosa gymnocarpa |
Baldhip rose, naked-hip
rose, little wild rose, little wood rose, wood rose (to 6’) |
* For height considerations,
prune trees when young to encourage horizontal rather than vertical growth.
Do not prune Maples
from Christmas to May (when sap is running). References
|
Arborists:
Roger
Barnett Barnett Tree Care
(206) 542-9523 John
Cedarland Artistic Landscape Service
(360) 653-1574 Scott
Mayer (206)
361-8251 Tim
Waterman Northern Arboriculture (206)
306-1740 | Books:
Grant, Carol
L. and John A: Trees and Shrubs for Pacific Northwest Gardens
Jacobson, Arthur
Lee North American Landscape Trees Kruckeberg,
Arthur R. Gardening with Native Plants of the Northwest Sunset
Publishing Corporation Western Garden Book Turnbull,
Cass Landscape
Design, Renovation, and Maintenance |
|