The Court's Order

Court of Appeals decision

Order on Cross enfoceability

Special Master Guidelines

Court's recommendation

 

 


View Information
Reserves Policy

In August of 2004, residents came up with a recommendation for addressing covenant compliance complaints. Petitions are initially addressed by a committee of volunteers rather than by the Board. This recommendation was adopted by the Board during the September 14, 2004 Board meeting.

In April of 2005, the Board adopted a bylaw amendment to incorporate covenant enforcement, including a hearing process and implementation of fines for non-compliance. Here is the petition process.

Petitioners may select either option.

History of Efforts to Preserve and Restore Views

1940’s

The Boeing Company purchased Innis Arden in 1940 after the land had been logged. Boeing promoted Innis Arden as having "inspiring views, wooded ravines, a profusion of native shrubs with panoramic views of the water and the mountains."  Covenants were drawn up for the  “development, improvement, maintenance, and protection of the real property.” 

1980s

Many lots in Innis Arden had lost or were losing their views due to vegetation on private lots, despite covenants aimed at preserving views, such as those governing building size and prohibiting such things as “spite” fences or hedges.  In 1980, the newly formed View Protection Committee drafted an amendment to the covenants limiting the height of view-blocking trees on private lots.  As required by the covenants, the amendment was approved by the owners of at least 60 of 92 tracts (66%) in Innis Arden I, 150 of 214 tracts (70%) in Innis Arden II, and 150 of 229 (66%) in Innis Arden III. The signed instruments were recorded with the King County Division of Records and the amendment (attachment A) became binding on June 17, 1982 on all lots, except for those that never had views. Shelly Rolfe, President, and Judy Runions, Secretary, attested to the required number of signatures.

While most residents heeded the amendment and many lost views were restored, some refused to conform, claiming the amendment was not legal. In spite of efforts by the Board, view reclamation came to a halt.

As a result, in 1986 a lawsuit was filed against some 20 residents who refused to observe the amendment (Innis Arden Club, Inc. v. Binns, Civ. No. 84-2-099622-5). The Superior Court held the amendment valid and enforceable (see order). In the subsequent appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment and declared that “protection of the area’s marine and mountain view is eminently reasonable and such views very obviously are and always have been one of the principle attractions of the Innis Arden development.” The Superior Court created “Procedures For Special Master Process” (attachment B) and appointed a judge to enforce the amendment in individual cases.

1990s

In 1992, the Superior Court decided that “the majority of the work that the covenants were intended to accomplish has in fact been accomplished by that petition process”.  Judge Anne Ellington expressed concern about the “difference in cost to the parties of participating through the Special Master process we designed versus individual enforcement actions, but I think it very likely that the Community Club, faced with the responsibility for doing so, could devise a very effective mediation process which could resolve any outstanding issues.”  Judge Ellington noted that the guidelines (attachment B) that were set up for the Special Master Process would continue to be binding.  She urged the community to set up a “simple procedure” that would perhaps “go some length toward healing the wounds…in this community” (footnote 1).

2000s

In April and May of 2001, the Innis Arden Board appointed Marc Weinberg to the position of View Information Chair, concerning trees on private property.  This Non-Voting Committee Chair served the role of 1) educating the community regarding views on private property 2) exploring the feasibility of a community survey regarding view preservation on private property and 3) working with the Building & Remodels chair to develop a protocol for landscape review to be incorporated into the approval process. The Board recently approved of a permit application from the Grouse Reserve Neighborhood Association. If approved, the application will allow affected residents to restore their views through the reserve while still complying with Shoreline Development Code.

Footnotes:

1. Proceeding, June 15, 1992, No. 84-2-09622-5

View Friendly Plantings

The following plants include ornamental species suitable for Western Washington and a view community such as Innis Arden.

Low Shrubs-to 6

ABELIA Edward Goucher        

Edward Goucher Abeilia

AUCUBA japonica nana

Dwarf Aucuba

BERBERS

Darwin & Warty Barberry

CARPENTERIA californica

Mock Orange

CHAMAECYPARIS obtuse nana

Dwarf Hinoki Cypress

CHAMECYPARIS pisifera filifera

Thread Cypress

CHOSIYA ternata

Mexican Orange

COTONEASTER  microphyllus

Rockspray  Cotoneaster

DAPHNE

Odora & Collina

ESCALLONIA compakta

‘Compakta' & 'Fradesii’ & ‘Jubilee'

GAULTHERIA shallon

Salal

ILEX crenata

Japanese Holly & Buffords Holly

KALMIA latifolia

Mountain Laurel

LEUCOTHOE catesbaei

Drooping Leucothoe -also Texas sage

LIGUSTRUM japonica

Wax-leaf Privet

MAH0NIA aquifolium

Oregon Grape

NANDINA domestica

Heavenly Bamboo -some compacts

OSMANTHUS delavayi

Delavay Osmanthus

PIERSS japonica

Andromeda or Lily of the Valley shrub

PINUS Mugo mughus

Mugho Pine

PITTOSPORUM tobira

Wheeler's Dwarf Pittosporum

POTENTILLA fruiticosa

Bush Cinquefoil

PRUNUS

'Otto Luyken’ Laurel

RHAPHIOLEPIS indica

Indian Hawthorn

RHODODENDREN

Many - Also Azaleas

TERNSTROEMIA japonica 

Relative of Camellia

THUJA orientalis Berkmani 

‘Berkmans' Dwarf arborvitae

Deciduous Trees--to 20'

ACER ginnala

Amur Maple - variety “Flame’’ Bright red fall foliage

ACER griseum

Paperbark Maple

ACER palmatum (some)

Japanese - Bloodgood or Bloodleaf

BETULA youngi

Weeping Birch

CORNUS

  • alternifolia
  • Welshi
  • Kousa
  • Xrutgersensis

Pogada Dogwood

Tri-color Dogwood

Kousa-Gold Star'

Stellar Dogwood - many varieties

COTINUS coggyria

Purple - Leaf Smoke Bush Variety 'Grace' shorter

MAGNOLIA stelllata

Star Magnolia

MALUS

Crabapple-some varieties-

'Arnold’- ‘Parkman'- ‘Sargent'-

'Floribunda'- Echterineyer- Weeping

PRUNUS (flowering cherry)

Shogetsu - Tri Loba – Weeping Cherry

SOPHORA

Weeping Pagoda Tree

STEWARTIA

Mountain stewartia & variety‘Grandiflora'

ULMUS

Camperdown Elm - weeping

Low Conifer Trees--to 20’

CHAMAECYPARIS obtuse gracilis      

Slender Hinoki Cypress

CHAMAECYPARIS pisifera ‘Cyano Viridis’

Boulevard False Cypress

TSUGA mertensiana

Mountain Hemlock

THUJA occidentalis Pyranidalus          

Pyramidalis (easily maintained)

TAXUS baccata stricta

Irish Yew (easily maintained)


Native Plants

Acer circinatum*

Vine Maple: 15-25’, drought tolerant, beautiful in groves or as individuals. Nice winter form.

Amelanchier alnifolia

Serviceberry: 6-8’, Deciduous, erect shrub with clusters of pristine white flowers followed by ½ inch purple berries loved by birds and people for pies and jam. Tolerates full, hot sun.

Cornus sericea, occidentalis

Red-osier dogwood, creek dogwood, red-twig dogwood (to 15’)

Gaultheria shallon

Salal (3’-7’)

Holodiscus discolor, creambush, arrowwood, rock-spiraea

Oceanspray, (to 15’)

Lithocarpus densiflorus var echinoides

Tanbark Oak: 6-8’, Handsome evergreen. New growth is silvery to cream to pink. The species is tall, so be sure to get var. echinoids.

Lonicera ciliosa

Orange honeysuckle, trumpet honeysuckle (10’ to 20’)

Oemleria cerasiformis

Indian-plum, osoberry (5’ – 16’)

Physocarpus capitatus

Pacific ninebark, ninebark (6’-13’)

Ribes sanguineum

Red flowering currant:  6-9’, lovely spring flowers attract hummingbirds. An exceptional Northwest native, prized by gardeners.

Rosa gymnocarpa

Baldhip rose, naked-hip rose, little wild rose, little wood rose, wood rose (to 6’)

* For height considerations, prune trees when young to encourage horizontal rather than vertical growth.
Do not prune Maples from Christmas to May (when sap is running).

References

Arborists:

Roger Barnett
Barnett Tree Care

(206) 542-9523

John Cedarland 
Artistic Landscape Service

(360) 653-1574

John Hushagen, Seattle
Tree Preservation Inc.

(206) 367-4048

Scott Mayer
206) 361-8251

Tim Waterman,
Northern Arboriculture
(206) 306-1740

Books:

Grant, Carol L. and John A:
Trees and Shrubs for Pacific Northwest Gardens

Jacobson, Arthur Lee
North American Landscape Trees

Kruckeberg, Arthur R.
Gardening with Native Plants of the Northwest

Sunset Publishing Corporation
Western Garden Book

Turnbull, Cass
Landscape Design, Renovation, and Maintenance